Announcement

Collapse

Fan Fiction Rules & Guidelines

THE RULES & GUIDELINES OF FAN FICTION


-There will be no flaming (insulting), spamming (making stupid, inane posts) and flame-baiting (luring someone into flaming you).

-You can't use deceased wrestlers. The only exception to this rule is if you're doing a federation that takes place in the 80s or something similar.

-Keep everything regarding your federation in one thread.

-There are three places where you can advertise a federation: in the thread of that federation, in your signature and in the Fed Thread. Nowhere else, if we find any advertising elsewhere, you will receive a warning for SPAM.

-Don't expect to get reviews from other people if you don't give reviews yourself. If you don't want any feedback to your shows, fine.

-Don't give feedback in the middle of a show. Posting in the middle of a show will result in deletion of your post and a warning for spam.

-You are not expected to leave a full on review of the show (though you can if you like). All you are required to do is to write a few comments with some substance behind them. This in no way shape or form means you can post one line reviews, they will be deleted and warned. So don’t post something like "Wow, great show! 9/10!".

-Even though it is creative writing, due to board rules we cannot allow racial and/or homophobic slurs/insults/etc. in your feds. This type of language will be warned immediately. And please note - racism is an automatic ban.

-Don't get mad when someone rips your show to pieces. Use the criticism in a positive way and use it to increase the quality of your federation. When someone insults you instead of giving good feedback, report that post to the Moderators.

-Don't bump your thread to the top if you've written nothing new in days. It just pushes other threads that are active down.

-If you're going to write a federation, put some effort in it. Stuff with horrendous grammar and spelling and no punctuation will be deleted. So will posts that only have ten or so sentences. They are regarded as spam. If you don't put effort into writing, don't even bother.

-If you're tired of your current federation and want to start a new one or return to an older federation, your current one must have at least four regular shows and a Pay-Per-View. This is done to prevent threads that have one or two posts in it. If you don't follow this rule, you'll be forbidden to start a new federation or return to an old federation for two weeks. If you make a fed within two weeks of the first one closing or return to an old fed, will we lock your thread, and it will not be opened for ANOTHER two weeks. For example, if you leave your thread on the 1st of the month and then make another one on the 10th, we will lock your new thread until the 24th. Two weeks from the opening of your new thread, remember that folks! For those whos fed follow the 'DVD Format' your fed must have contained at least four chapters in order to bypass the two week rule.

- Posters are now allowed a second fed, providing they have proven their commitment to their first fed. Permission to start a second fed will be granted from the moderating team. We will not consider anyone whose fed has not lasted at least two pay-per-views, however, this does not guarantee we will say yes.

- Two feds at a time Max.

- If you have two running at the same time, both must be updated a minimum of every 30 days. If this is not maintained without valid reason, one will be closed (poster's choice as to which is closed).

- If you abandon a fed/fed gets closed/etc., then you must wait until gaining permission again to start another second fed.

-You can also have one additional non-Fed related story in addition to your federation. This non-Fed has a two week rule, meaning you wait two weeks from the last post to post a new one.

-You do not need to contact WMS or RT to close a thread for you if you're moving on to a new project. Just let it drop to the bottom. We will also no longer be cleaning old threads for you -- start a new thread. Also, we do NOT delete threads. We keep them around for historical value.

-Spotlight of the Month: this is currently decided by the Power 10 Rankings. The winner is given the dubious honor of being the Spotlight of the Month. That Fed will be stickied for the entire month with the added extension “Spotlight of the Month” added to the end of their Fed Title.

-No more "I'll be starting a fed soon" or "more to come soon". Start your fed with substance or it will be deleted. And then you’ll have to wait two weeks to start another one.

-Plagiarizing is a serious offence and anyone caught doing so will be banned without warning.

-Multi-Participation Threads are banned for the time being, they descend into chaos too quick and quite frankly too much time is spent modding them.

-DO NOT post reviews of reviews, arguing with every person who reviews you. If you would like, after a substantial period of time, to reply to all reviews together, fine. Mindless bumps will not be accepted.

-Please note that all your shows and PPVs must take place in your thread not on a website elsewhere. Everybody else can write it here, so can you.

- The 20 Questions thread is a Question and Answer interview-like thread for the members of Fan Fiction. The “next” person to participate in the thread is chosen by the current person being interviewed. Please do not post asking to be next. The person before you makes that decision.

- Please do not post "get on AIM/MSN/Yahoo." If you want them to do so, send them a Private Message or Rep asking so. There is no need to waste a post doing so.

- General Discussion is banned from Fan Fiction. It was great while it lasted, but it was abused too many times.

-NO EROTIC LITERATURE!

Finally, a harsh reality for people: WMS and RT are the last word on a subject in FF. If we ask you, or tell you, to do something, it isn't a debate. At least not on the forum. If you have a problem, IM or PM one of us, and we will gladly sort it out.

Thank you.
The Fan Fiction Moderating Team,
WMS & RT
See more
See less

The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

    Actually Fallen, I wasn't saying fuck anybody who didn't do it my way. I was actually saying that I felt Wisey was telling us all to do the same thing.

    I don't really understand your dig, Wisey, about me being precious. I just thought you criticized everyone who didn't book Owens/Zayn and everyone who didn't have Reigns and Ambrose on their card. I'll shut up though.
    Visit prowrestlingiowa.net
    Follow me on Twitter: @1RealSmartAlex
    Wonder what happened to the guy Seth Rollins did a moonsault off of? Follow @OfftheChestTR and listen to "Off the Chest of Timothy Regal"

    Comment


    • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

      Originally posted by AM View Post
      Actually Fallen, I wasn't saying fuck anybody who didn't do it my way. I was actually saying that I felt Wisey was telling us all to do the same thing.

      I don't really understand your dig, Wisey, about me being precious. I just thought you criticized everyone who didn't book Owens/Zayn and everyone who didn't have Reigns and Ambrose on their card. I'll shut up though.
      I'm 99% sure Fallen was referring to me, and in turn, I was responding to Fallen.

      Or at least that's what I took from that post. Perhaps he misinterpreted your post, and I then misinterpreted his. It's the internet, it's not the first time words have been misconstrued. Maybe we both should have used "reply with quote". I'm too lazy.

      I appreciate your justification. I offered my justification. If Fallen was referring to me, I'd like to see justification on his card's part.

      For further justification, take a look at my feedback for task one from last year's Ultimate Fic'er. I gave criticism on matches I didn't think should have been booked on the card, and offered alternatives as perhaps better ideas. That doesn't mean they're better, it's just what I, the judge, view as being more logical. And logic is what I base my feedback on in such cases. None of this is personal.
      Man of the world.

      Comment


      • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by AM View Post
        Actually Fallen, I wasn't saying fuck anybody who didn't do it my way. I was actually saying that I felt Wisey was telling us all to do the same thing.

        I don't really understand your dig, Wisey, about me being precious. I just thought you criticized everyone who didn't book Owens/Zayn and everyone who didn't have Reigns and Ambrose on their card. I'll shut up though.
        I'm 99% sure Fallen was referring to me, and in turn, I was responding to Fallen.

        Or at least that's what I took from that post. Perhaps he misinterpreted your post, and I then misinterpreted his. It's the internet, it's not the first time words have been misconstrued. Maybe we both should have used "reply with quote". I'm too lazy.

        I appreciate your justification. I offered my justification. If Fallen was referring to me, I'd like to see justification on his card's part.

        For further justification, take a look at my feedback for task one from last year's Ultimate Fic'er. I gave criticism on matches I didn't think should have been booked on the card, and offered alternatives as perhaps better ideas. That doesn't mean they're better, it's just what I, the judge, view as being more logical. And logic is what I base my feedback on in such cases. None of this is personal.
        Man of the world.

        Comment


        • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

          If you can't handle a little criticism why even sign up for this? I was told to change 95% of my card and I'm using it to improve (hopefully). Though I would like to turn out that calling Bull Dempsey a joke character appeared to miss the fact that I have a guy named "Bull" getting roped. That match was thrown in pretty much as a joke.
          If all of mankind minus one were of of one opinion, and only one person of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.
          -John Stuart Mill

          Comment


          • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

            If you can't handle a little criticism why even sign up for this? I was told to change 95% of my card and I'm using it to improve (hopefully). Though I would like to turn out that calling Bull Dempsey a joke character appeared to miss the fact that I have a guy named "Bull" getting roped. That match was thrown in pretty much as a joke.
            If all of mankind minus one were of of one opinion, and only one person of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.
            -John Stuart Mill

            Comment


            • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by Sea Slug View Post
              If you can't handle a little criticism why even sign up for this? I was told to change 95% of my card and I'm using it to improve (hopefully). Though I would like to turn out that calling Bull Dempsey a joke character appeared to miss the fact that I have a guy named "Bull" getting roped. That match was thrown in pretty much as a joke.
              Thank you. I was shitty to this guy right here more than anyone in this stage and he's taken it on the chin. I'll see better from him with the promo as a result.

              I missed the Bull thing. That works as a segment, I guess. I have a tendency to skim read. When I'm given nine entries, I do rush a little with my reading.
              Man of the world.

              Comment


              • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by Sea Slug View Post
                If you can't handle a little criticism why even sign up for this? I was told to change 95% of my card and I'm using it to improve (hopefully). Though I would like to turn out that calling Bull Dempsey a joke character appeared to miss the fact that I have a guy named "Bull" getting roped. That match was thrown in pretty much as a joke.
                Thank you. I was shitty to this guy right here more than anyone in this stage and he's taken it on the chin. I'll see better from him with the promo as a result.

                I missed the Bull thing. That works as a segment, I guess. I have a tendency to skim read. When I'm given nine entries, I do rush a little with my reading.
                Man of the world.

                Comment


                • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by WMS View Post
                  I'm 99% sure Fallen was referring to me, and in turn, I was responding to Fallen.

                  Or at least that's what I took from that post. Maybe we both should have used "reply with quote". I'm too lazy.

                  I appreciate your justification. I offered my justification. If Fallen was referring to me, I'd like to see justification on his card's part.

                  For further justification, take a look at my feedback for task one from last year's Ultimate Fic'er. I gave criticism on matches I didn't think should have been booked on the card, and offered alternatives as perhaps better ideas. That doesn't mean they're better, it's just what I, the judge, view as being more logical. And logic is what I base my feedback on in such cases. None of this is personal.
                  I was not referring to you. The world does not revolve around you. I took AM's quote to mean exactly how it looked. I thought he was referring to "US" as the people auditioning. I read my feedback and glanced at most of the others, but I don't really care what you said about the others personally. I was in agreement with your analysis and you were right on with the change. Sometimes, things are actually as they look. Thanks for the shot. It doesn't come unexpectedly, surprised it's taken this long. Shall I just fold the tent up now? (That would be taking things, as you say, preciously).

                  Comment


                  • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by WMS View Post
                    I'm 99% sure Fallen was referring to me, and in turn, I was responding to Fallen.

                    Or at least that's what I took from that post. Maybe we both should have used "reply with quote". I'm too lazy.

                    I appreciate your justification. I offered my justification. If Fallen was referring to me, I'd like to see justification on his card's part.

                    For further justification, take a look at my feedback for task one from last year's Ultimate Fic'er. I gave criticism on matches I didn't think should have been booked on the card, and offered alternatives as perhaps better ideas. That doesn't mean they're better, it's just what I, the judge, view as being more logical. And logic is what I base my feedback on in such cases. None of this is personal.
                    I was not referring to you. The world does not revolve around you. I took AM's quote to mean exactly how it looked. I thought he was referring to "US" as the people auditioning. I read my feedback and glanced at most of the others, but I don't really care what you said about the others personally. I was in agreement with your analysis and you were right on with the change. Sometimes, things are actually as they look. Thanks for the shot. It doesn't come unexpectedly, surprised it's taken this long. Shall I just fold the tent up now? (That would be taking things, as you say, preciously).

                    Comment


                    • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by Fallen View Post
                      I was not referring to you. The world does not revolve around you. I took AM's quote to mean exactly how it looked. I thought he was referring to "US" as the people auditioning. I read my feedback and glanced at most of the others, but I don't really care what you said about the others personally. I was in agreement with your analysis and you were right on with the change. Sometimes, things are actually as they look. Thanks for the shot. It doesn't come unexpectedly, surprised it's taken this long. Shall I just fold the tent up now? (That would be taking things, as you say, preciously).
                      Fair enough. That makes two of us who were mistaken, no harm doing. I'll admit I took your comment the wrong way. I'll also be more careful to use reply with quote in future to avoid any more confusion.

                      Just over a week for you guys to work on your promo. Remember to get in touch with your mentor if you want any tips on how to avoid me poo-pooing on your work. Maybe we can get to stage two with zero eliminations.
                      Man of the world.

                      Comment


                      • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by Fallen View Post
                        I was not referring to you. The world does not revolve around you. I took AM's quote to mean exactly how it looked. I thought he was referring to "US" as the people auditioning. I read my feedback and glanced at most of the others, but I don't really care what you said about the others personally. I was in agreement with your analysis and you were right on with the change. Sometimes, things are actually as they look. Thanks for the shot. It doesn't come unexpectedly, surprised it's taken this long. Shall I just fold the tent up now? (That would be taking things, as you say, preciously).
                        Fair enough. That makes two of us who were mistaken, no harm doing. I'll admit I took your comment the wrong way. I'll also be more careful to use reply with quote in future to avoid any more confusion.

                        Just over a week for you guys to work on your promo. Remember to get in touch with your mentor if you want any tips on how to avoid me poo-pooing on your work. Maybe we can get to stage two with zero eliminations.
                        Man of the world.

                        Comment


                        • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

                          I can take criticism just fine. I strongly didn't agree with you saying Ryback and Corbin would be AIDs or however you put it, but I respected that was your opinion. I just was pretty surprised that I thought you essentially said everyone should've booked Owens/Zayn with a stip and you must have Reigns and Ambrose on your card. But I'm really done now. It's way too early for salt.
                          Visit prowrestlingiowa.net
                          Follow me on Twitter: @1RealSmartAlex
                          Wonder what happened to the guy Seth Rollins did a moonsault off of? Follow @OfftheChestTR and listen to "Off the Chest of Timothy Regal"

                          Comment


                          • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

                            I can take criticism just fine. I strongly didn't agree with you saying Ryback and Corbin would be AIDs or however you put it, but I respected that was your opinion. I just was pretty surprised that I thought you essentially said everyone should've booked Owens/Zayn with a stip and you must have Reigns and Ambrose on your card. But I'm really done now. It's way too early for salt.
                            Visit prowrestlingiowa.net
                            Follow me on Twitter: @1RealSmartAlex
                            Wonder what happened to the guy Seth Rollins did a moonsault off of? Follow @OfftheChestTR and listen to "Off the Chest of Timothy Regal"

                            Comment


                            • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

                              I wanted to do something different which is why I personally left Ambrose and Reigns off my card. Looking through my feedback points a lot of stuff out though. I totally should have teamed Breeze and Miz up and i'm slightly embarrassed that I didn't see that.

                              Plenty to learn and i'm looking forward to cutting my teeth on the promo, I know what I want to express, just have to see how it goes.


                              A ton and a half of credit to Rad for this superb artwork


                              Originally posted by The Miz
                              I'd rather you all hate me for everything I am than love me for something i'm not
                              Days Oncall has left to use his MITB Contract: 300-ish

                              Comment


                              • Re: The X-Fictor ~ Discussion Thread

                                I wanted to do something different which is why I personally left Ambrose and Reigns off my card. Looking through my feedback points a lot of stuff out though. I totally should have teamed Breeze and Miz up and i'm slightly embarrassed that I didn't see that.

                                Plenty to learn and i'm looking forward to cutting my teeth on the promo, I know what I want to express, just have to see how it goes.


                                A ton and a half of credit to Rad for this superb artwork


                                Originally posted by The Miz
                                I'd rather you all hate me for everything I am than love me for something i'm not
                                Days Oncall has left to use his MITB Contract: 300-ish

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X