Makes me not want to go to WM29 and instead go to WM 30.
It makes so much sense. Figure this is what were going to get:
Cena vs Rock 2
HHH vs Brock 2
Punk vs Undertaker
Ryback vs Big Show
Punk is going to be the hottest heel going into WM29 and it's only going to help as he tries to end the streak of The Undertaker. Funny that Undertaker once got Punk in trouble because Punk refused to wear a suit and a tie.
But what about WM30?
I'm hoping for Austin vs Punk, but why not have:
Cena cheat to defeat The Rock saying that he was not going to go another year with that in the back if his mind. He was not going to let everything he has ever worked for be ruined because he lost to The Rock for two straight years at WM. have Cena be a heel for a year, claim he has accomplished everything except for one thing. Ending The Streak
All of a sudden: WM30 is headlined by Austin/Punk and Cena/Undertaker.
Thoughts? I feel like this is the best opportunity the WWE is ever going to have to make serious money off of a Cena heel turn.
Makes me not want to go to WM29 and instead go to WM 30.
That is a really solid idea. I've been hoping for a Cena heel turn since 2007, but it just never seems to come. I wish WWE would take the opportunity to give us a fresh take on Cena's character, which a heel turn would allow. In my personal opinion if Cena wants to be remembered as one of the best of his era he has to prove he can be a great heel.
Make it happen WWE!
To be honest I think john turning heel would be a bad idea! Considering his fan base and all the work he does for make a wish and other various charities! I think he has been face for too long it wouldn't make sense to me for him to turn now especially so far into his career!
Costing The Rock the title at Royal Rumble because of how his career has gone since the loss to Rock would make sense, even though he's helping his greatest rival in CM Punk retain the WWE Championship. Then he just fucking massacres Rock, Rock blades...Cena puts his angry face on...little kids crying...he destroys security guards when they arrive, smacks Lawler a couple of times...just snaps. Then he beats Rock at Wrestlemania, clean.
I'm not sure how it would be received, but I'd like to see it.
People are still going to be asking for Austin/Punk when Austin is 70. I know you're supposed to never say never in wrestling, but how many years in a row can we speculate on an Austin return?
As for Cena vs. Undertaker, that should be happening this year, except that WWE is filled with morons.
Punk vs. Taker is a bad idea imo although I can see the value in streak vs title with CM Punk still holding the title all the way to Mania.
It just isn't feasible though for obvious reasons. As stated Cena/Taker should be happening and the heel turn would work better in that scenario.
Who is the boss? Who made wrestling? Who is sports entertainment?
WRESTLEMANIA 4 LIFE~~
I don't think Cena should turn heel.
It's not because of how much merchandise he sells or the Make a Wish thing.
The reason why Cena gets the a lot of the hate he does isn't because of his stale character or whatever. It's because he's been presented as "The Center of the WWE Universe". But ever since the AJ/Cena/Vickie/Ziggler scandal storyline began, Cena has been phased out of the spotlight. A face Cena can be toned down and quietly put on the backburner. Cena, as he currently is, is fine. He's out of the title picture, and out of the main event. But if Cena has a big shocking heel turn, then a large chunk of the show is going to be focused on "Why Cena Why?" and focusing on the motivations for his heel turn. If Cena turns heel, then he'll be back to being all over the show and being the center of the universe all over again.
Would Hulk Hogan be as big as he is if not for Hollywood Hulk Hogan?
Cena needs a heel turn. Fuck he's overdue by 5 or more years. Make it happen. Cena is a joke now and his character is stale and horrible.
You want to make Cena heel? Punk vs. Taker at WM for the title (last match) Cena has already pinned The Rock clean. After two GTS Taker will not stay down Punk is getting frustrated ref gets knocked down and Cena runs out.... looks at both of them laying on the mat exhausted both men get up around the same time Cena still standing in the middle of them grabs Taker for the FU... punks pins Taker to end the streak and Cena is uber heel. WM30 match is set.
Well the idea itself makes no sense, because you're taking almost all the juice out of Cena vs. Taker by having the streak not be on the line.
What is Taker fighting for? Revenge for having the streak ended? He doesn't get the streak back, it's not a championship.
The end of the streak is the end of the Undertaker. Doing it any other way diminishes the end of the streak in itself, and if you're going to do that, just let him retire with it.
I have to agree that its clear that if the streak ends Undertaker is gone. I really don't see the streak ever ending. I'm not sure Cena really has anything to gain from ending the streak anyway. Cena could make an equally powerful heel turn without ending the streak.
- Cena screws Taker which starts the feud
- Taker pissed off that he was screwed will want vengeance
- Cena/Taker have a match
What doesn't make sense? I'll write my post up in French if it'll help you understand better.
Let me explain to you the many different levels on which that does not make sense in this situation.
1. Ending the streak would have to be designed to get the guy who ends it over as a heel. If you have someone end the streak, only to lose to Undertaker immediately, it accomplishes absolutely nothing.
2. The streak should not end on a screwjob. You don't want to cheapen 20 years of history by having it end that way.
3. What the fuck happens to Punk afterwards? He's the guy who actually ended the streak. Yet he fades into oblivion while Cena and Taker feud?
4. The appeal in Cena vs. Taker as a match lies in the fact that people could be convinced that the streak really could end. You completely lose that if the streak is not on the line.
5. The Undertaker should be retired already. He sticks around SOLELY for the streak. The man has been wrestling for more than 20 years. The day he loses the streak, it's time for him to hang it up.
I could probably think of a couple more reasons if I really tried. It's just a bad idea all around and doesn't make sense on any level.
The streak is different from a normal wrestling feud. You can't book it like you would book anything.
I'm honestly not convinced WWE will ever commit to Cena going heel, but there are some options if they wanted to do it.
2. He either loses it on a screw job or retires with the streak intact.
3. He's champion.
4. I'm sick of Taker being all about the streak. It would be much more entertaining with an actual hate filled feud rather then stale boring Cena chasing a streak like other have in his past 10WM matches. The actual appeal in Cena vs. Taker is you have the two top guys in the company both whom now have something interesting going instead of boring old marine Cena and Taker with the streak.
5. He can hang it up after a real feud with Cena.
Who made that rule? You?2. He either loses it on a screw job or retires with the streak intact.
You do realize that having it end clean is the most productive means of doing it, right?
That's all he gets out of it? Being WWE Champion still? And you call that a worthwhile way to end a 20 year streak?3. He's champion.
There are plenty of "hate filled" feuds in WWE. We get one streak feud a year.4. I'm sick of Taker being all about the streak. It would be much more entertaining with an actual hate filled feud rather then stale boring Cena chasing a streak like the past 10 guys have. The actual appeal in Cena vs. Taker is you have the two top guys in the company both whom now have something interesting going instead of boring old marine Cena and Taker with the streak.
Boring old marine Cena and Taker with the streak make money.
He can have a real feud with Cena while he still has the streak. Even if he were to beat Cena and retire with the streak, that's still a lot better than what you're proposing. Same feud, almost certainly more money.5. He can hang it up after a real feud with Cena.
People with common sense.Who made that rule? You?
So Punk pins Taker clean and according to you Taker retires and Punk gets nothing out of it besides being just WWE champion still. According to you.You do realize that having it end clean is the most productive means of doing it, right?
Plus a major heel boost for ending the streak.That's all he gets out of it? Being WWE Champion still? And you call that a worthwhile way to end a 20 year streak?
An actual hate filled feud would make more money and be more entertaining.Boring old marine Cena and Taker with the streak make money.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)